Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-01-30-Speech-3-122"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-01-30"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Accomplishment of the internal market in Community postal services (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080130.19.3-122"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-01-30-Speech-3-1232
lpv:speaker	lp:Luigi Cocilovo2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; ALDE (2004-12-09--2009-07-13)3 unknown; La Margherita (2004-07-21--2008-02-06)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2006-06-15--2009-07-13)3 member; EMPL (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 vice-president; European Parliament (2007-01-16--2009-07-13)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2007-01-16--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, I too, like all my colleagues, would like to congratulate the rapporteur, Mr Ferber, on his work. This was a job that was initiated a long time ago and during the course of which we have had significant moments of convergence and some moments of constructive discussion. As far as my position and that of my group is concerned, there has never been any conflict of principles or ideology against the idea of liberalisation, which we all agree with and support, while, of course, seeking to ensure the guarantees that are necessary for a universal service. In the current proposal for the Directive, which was approved by the Parliament during its first reading and then reconsidered by the Council, we can see that this guarantee is there, even if some of the conditions could be made more precise, specific and detailed. We do not want to be like those who cannot see the wood for the trees, but, on the other hand, nor do we want to ignore the fact that sometimes the devil is in the detail. For this reason we would have preferred that, as regards some of the issues concerning authorisations, concerning ensuring proper competition and also concerning tariff payments between the operator charged with providing the universal service and other individual services, concerning rights and responsibilities as regards network access, that some of the questions had been gone into in more detail. We would have preferred this, but the majority of the views taken in Parliament, which were also represented among the committee, was probably that making the guarantees more precise was unnecessary, and preferred instead not to run the risk of coming to a complicated agreement. In summary, at this time we hold this standpoint and, as regards the amendments concerning conditions for the blind and the visually impaired, we would like to state clearly that, if these and only these amendments were to force a settlement to be reached, we would not be in favour. However, if other amendments should be approved we shall also vote in favour. Otherwise, we would vote against all the amendments put forward."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph