Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-12-12-Speech-3-202"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20071212.23.3-202"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Although it contains aspects that criticise, albeit mildly, the violations of human rights committed in the name of the so-called ‘fight against terrorism’ – violations which we clearly and firmly condemned from the outset – this resolution does not dissociate itself from the fight or seek to challenge it when international law is flouted and State terrorism is practised in its name.
Yes, it certainly calls for criticism of the violation of the right to a fair trial and data protection, the lack of transparency and democratic control, the refusal of the Council to answer ‘
’.
Nevertheless, we cannot accept that, under cover of the so-called ‘fight against terrorism’, Parliament should ‘
’ and call on ‘
’; that it should highlight, once again, that ‘
’, adopting US foreign policy lock, stock and barrel; or that it should call for ‘
’ and for it to be accorded ‘
’."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"allegations of abuse of powers under the pretext of counter-terrorism, in particular in the case of CIA extraordinary renditions and black sites"1
"independent power to conduct investigations"1
"the Member States to ratify it"1
"the US is an essential partner in this field"1
"the powers of Europol to be reinforced"1
"warmly welcome the adoption of the new Reform Treaty"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples