Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-12-11-Speech-2-311"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20071211.38.2-311"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"Question No 36 by Karin Riis-Jørgensen ()
Over the past five years we have witnessed a very lively debate in the USA on net neutrality, including the question of the extent to which network operators can limit and control user traffic on the internet. The telecom reform package addresses this issue, and seeks to resolve it by demanding greater transparency for users about what they are purchasing. But, as we have seen with the intervention on roaming charges, transparency is not always enough to protect the consumer. Unrestricted access to the Internet encourages innovation (as with Skype, Joost, web 2.0 etc.). However, when telecoms companies have the right to prioritise and even maybe block user traffic on the Internet, does the Commission consider that the telecom reform package does enough to protect consumers and promote innovation on the Internet? And what would be the optimum solution?"@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"Subject: Net neutrality in the telecom reform package"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples