Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-12-11-Speech-2-303"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-12-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20071211.38.2-303"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-12-11-Speech-2-3042
lpv:speaker	lp:Paul Rübig2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Österreichische Volkspartei - Liste Ursula Stenzel (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; EPP-ED (2007-02-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Temporary Committee on Climate Change (2007-05-10--2009-02-04)3 member; Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway and to the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CONT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"At the WTO negotiations it will be very important to negotiate on the chapter under which bioethanol should actually be dealt with in future. Will it be classed as an agricultural product, or does it belong in the category of non-agricultural products? How does the Commission see the future structure? Will the more likely aim be to discuss it in the agricultural chapter, or is it more of an industrial product? Bioethanol comes from a field crop and is essentially an agricultural raw material. On the other hand, however, as a energy product it could fall under the heading of non-agricultural market access (NAMA). Has the Commission already formed an opinion on this question and, if so, what line will it pursue in negotiations?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph