Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-11-13-Speech-2-131"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-11-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20071113.22.2-131"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-11-13-Speech-2-1322
lpv:speaker	lp:Hélène Goudin2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; ENVI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; PECH (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; DEVE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; IND/DEM (2007-06-13--2008-01-29)3 unknown; Junilistan (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2007-05-23--2008-10-22)3 substitute; IMCO (2007-10-08--2007-12-05)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"With all due respect for the subject matter, we would like to point out that this is a report the European Union could have done without. This European Parliament should devote itself to issues within a smaller area and not give opinions on everything under the sun. The European Parliament’s Committee on Culture and Education should be closed down because it deals with matters which are outside the scope of cooperation within the EU. For the most part the Committee produces reports which propose that the Union should go in and regulate areas of detail for which the EU does not have competence. Within the current EU cooperation framework it is established that the Member States have exclusive responsibility for the organisation of education. Cultural issues are also a matter for the Member States, and the Union is currently engaged in very limited cooperation relating to various cultural programmes. For these reasons there is no justification for the existence of the European Parliament’s Committee on Culture and Education."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph