Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-10-25-Speech-4-103"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU-Serbia relations (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20071025.18.4-103"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-10-25-Speech-4-1042
lpv:speaker	lp:Gerard Batten2
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, on a point of order, I rise under Rule 166, which says that the Member shall first specify to which rule he is referring. I am referring to that one. I understand that you cut off Mr Martin before he had a chance to finish what he wanted to say. He was making a point about yesterday. Yesterday, Mr Schulz made a lengthy political statement without referring to the rule under which he was speaking. It was allowed by the President, whereas Mr Martin was cut off. I think there is a bias at work here and a double standard, where those in favour of the EU are allowed to say what they want and those who are not in favour of it are cut off. Could we have an even application of the Rules please?"@en1
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFET (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; IND/DEM (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; SEDE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; UK Independence Party (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Applause from the right)"1 "Gerard Batten (IND/DEM ). –"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph