Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-10-24-Speech-3-225"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-10-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20071024.36.3-225"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-10-24-Speech-3-2262
lpv:speaker	lp:Karin Scheele2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Temporary Committee on Climate Change (2007-05-10--2008-12-10)3 member; ENVI (2007-01-31--2008-12-10)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2008-12-10)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2004-09-15--2008-12-10)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2008-12-10)3 substitute; DEVE (2007-01-31--2008-12-10)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (2004-07-20--2008-12-10)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, my colleagues from my delegation and I myself voted against the Reul report because we do not believe that nuclear energy is either safe or clean, and nor do we believe in the new generation of nuclear power plants and the new generation of nuclear energy. If it really is the case – and there are reports and statistics about this – that nuclear energy is to have a massive impact in terms of reducing our CO emissions, then we will have to have a substantial increase in the number of our nuclear power stations. That is neither realistic nor practicable. For that reason – and I will speak more on this subject when the next report comes round – effective measures to improve energy efficiency and also to cut CO emissions from cars would be a better way of making Europe a healthier place and convincing other countries and continents to follow suit."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"2"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph