Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-10-23-Speech-2-319"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date
"2007-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of
lp_eu:Commission Question Time2
dcterms:Language
"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number
"en.20071023.25.2-319"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lp_eu:2007-10-23-Speech-2-3202
lpv:speaker
lp:Anne Van Lancker2
lpv:spokenAs
member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
member; FEMM (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
unknown; Socialistische Partij.Anders- Sociaal, Progressief, Internationaal, Regionaal, Integraal Democratisch, Toekomstgericht (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
substitute; DEVE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
member; EMPL (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text
"Thank you for your answer, Commissioner. Also, incidentally, congratulations on your victory against Microsoft. Moving on to what I wanted to say, as I understand it, then, the matter is still being dealt with. Am I right in thinking that the new interpretation of the rules on State aid for training will also contain sufficient scope for social relevance in training courses ensuring that, if training gives workers more opportunities in the global labour market, this training aid will not be regarded as a major interference in competition?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph