Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-10-23-Speech-2-165"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20071023.20.2-165"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-10-23-Speech-2-1662
lpv:speaker	lp:Robert Goebbels2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Parti ouvrier socialiste luxembourgeois (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3,3 member; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; CONT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2007-03-16--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3,3 vice-chair; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Temporary Committee on Climate Change (2007-05-10--2009-02-04)3,3
lpv:translated text	". I systematically voted against the whole plant protection package to signal my opposition to a dossier that was not yet ready for the plenary session. Confronting 700 MEPs with 300 – 400 amendments, to be voted on in 3 or 4 instalments, is simply unworthy of a legislator. We might just as well organise a lottery. That the legislator wants to combat pesticide abuse seems laudable. However, organising a system that is so bureaucratic as to be inefficient stems from poor legislation. Anyway, if we want to feed a constantly increasing population the Earth cannot do without plant protection products."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph