Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-10-22-Speech-1-107"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20071022.14.1-107"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I highly value the fact that all three reports require the personnel involved in all phases of pesticide handling to be highly qualified. Action plans, integrated management and strict import measures: these are also examples of what is positive in all the reports. However, both the bans on aerial application and, alternatively, the situations where aerial application would be possible must be articulated precisely, using clear wording.
Similarly, the notion of a quantitative use reduction is not clearly defined and opens the door to many risks because of its non-selective application. For example, the Slovak Republic applies on average less than 1 kg of pesticides per hectare while other countries apply as much as 8 kg. This means that there are countries where pesticide use must be genuinely reduced and countries where pesticide use should even be increased. This is why I suggest that when voting we should take into account the recommendations of the European Crop Protection Association or alternatively, at first reading, not adopt reportsandand keep the balanced recommendations of the Commission."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples