Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-07-10-Speech-2-234"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20070710.49.2-234"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
The establishment of a common framework for action to protect European critical infrastructures means that we are once again faced with the central question of transferring competencies that lie at the heart of the States’ sovereignty to the sphere of the EU.
The definition of the protection of these infrastructures at Community level, in the name of the so-called ‘fight against terrorism’, will mean that the Member States will be faced with the responsibility of implementing
measures, as, indeed, is mentioned in the justification of this proposal.
Despite the rapporteur’s having mitigated the scope of the initial proposal, by underlining, for example, that
and considering
the fundamental objectives are not called into question.
It should also be emphasised that, as recent events have shown, measures which compromise the rights, freedoms and guarantees of the citizens have been implemented on the pretext of the said ‘fight against terrorism’. Let us hope that the concept of ‘protection of European critical infrastructures’ does not come to be used as an argument in favour of curtailing legitimate industrial action by workers defending their rights."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"binding"1
"‘that a Community approach is only justifiable if at least three Member States, or two Member States besides the one in which the critical infrastructure is situated, are affected’,"1
"‘the responsibility for the protection of critical infrastructures lies solely and exclusively with the Member States’"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples