Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-07-09-Speech-1-083"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-07-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Common authorisation procedure for food additives – Food additives – Food enzymes – Flavourings and food ingredients with flavouring properties for use in and on foods (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070709.15.1-083"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-07-09-Speech-1-0842
lpv:speaker	lp:Wiesław Stefan Kuc2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2007-04-25--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Samoobrona RP (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; AGRI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; UEN (2006-12-13--2009-07-13)3,3 member; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, growing competition between food producers and their battle to attract consumers have meant that the former strive to make their products appear as attractive as possible. They resort to artificial means to give the products a more pleasing appearance, a better taste or a longer shelf life. These actions are not always beneficial to consumers' health, however. The reports by Mrs Westlund, Mrs Doyle and Mrs Drčar Murko represent an effort to protect both our health and the environment. I refer to Amendment No 17 to Article 3. I cannot, therefore, understand why there are such large-scale exclusions from the definition of food additives. Why are sugars excluded? I use the term sugars to include multisugars such as starch, ammonium chloride, pectins and amino acids. Could this be due to pressure from major producers? If that is so, the report will not achieve its objective."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph