Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-06-06-Speech-3-231"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-06-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Baltic Sea cod (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070606.21.3-231"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-06-06-Speech-3-2322
lpv:speaker	lp:Hélène Goudin2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; ENVI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; PECH (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; IND/DEM (2004-07-20--2007-06-12)3 member; DEVE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Junilistan (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2007-05-23--2008-10-22)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Thank you, Mr President. The situation for cod in the Baltic Sea is a very serious one. For 2007, the ICES has recommended that no cod be fished in the eastern part of the Baltic, yet in spite of these recommendations a considerable quantity of cod will be landed. Where western stocks are concerned, 30% more than the recommended number will be fished, and in addition there will be unreported and illegal fishing. The Committee on Fisheries is trying to water down the Commission’s proposal, which basically does not consider the consequences for biological diversity, either. As always when fisheries issues are debated in this House, the socio-economic consequences of fishing are referred to. Certainly, a ban on fishing for cod may harm professional fishermen. However, overfishing means that, before long, there will be no fish left to catch. In the era of globalisation, it is necessary to be flexible and to be prepared to make structural changes in society. Tomorrow, I shall vote against Parliament’s proposal, even though I believe that the Commission’s proposal is unsatisfactory too."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph