Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-05-23-Speech-3-356"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-05-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Council Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070523.23.3-356"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-05-23-Speech-3-3572
lpv:speaker	lp:Günter Gloser2
lpv:translated text	". I can assure you that my answer to you was not diplomatic in character, but had to do with various things that have to be considered not by the Presidency alone, but by the Member States together, since various interests – the interests of what are now 27 Member States – are affected. I also made it clear that there are various users or consumers, together with importers, manufacturers and competitors, to consider. I do believe that it is right in principle that we have named October 2007 as the target date for reviewing whether the present protection, as it is laid down, is still appropriate in terms of time or whether there has to be a response on the part of the European Union. I am not familiar with the case to which you refer, but I do believe that it is the Commission’s practice to consider the various areas before possibly suspending the protection mechanism. The question that arises for me and for the Presidency, not least from the discussions we have had is that, if all these things had not had an influence on our process of deliberation, it is to be expected that there would be anger directed at the European Union from certain Member States, because it would have been seen as not keeping the different interests in balance."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph