Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-05-22-Speech-2-336"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-05-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Commission Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070522.26.2-336"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-05-22-Speech-2-3372
lpv:speaker	lp:Manuel dos Santos2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3 vice-president; European Parliament (2007-01-16--2009-07-13)3,3 member; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2007-01-16--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Partido Socialista (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Question no 44 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its answer to Question, the Commission states that 'the Convention on the Law of the Sea is indeed part of the Community acquis, which Turkey is expected to take over and enforce at the moment of its accession to the European Union'. In a previous answer to a related question () the Commission stated that 'the Commission expects Turkey to adopt and fully implement the acquis by the time of its accession to the European Union'. Why did the Commission change its position within the space of six months? Is Turkey required to adopt and implement the above Convention 'at the moment of its accession to the European Union' or 'to adopt and fully implement the acquis by the time of its accession to the Europe Union'? Can the Commission explain the legal basis of its position?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President."1 "Subject: Implementation by Turkey of the Convention on the Law of the Sea"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph