Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-03-28-Speech-3-108"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-03-28"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:The future of Kosovo and the role of the EU (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070328.14.3-108"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-03-28-Speech-3-1092
lpv:speaker	lp:Jan Marinus Wiersma2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; SEDE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Partij van de Arbeid (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; TRAN (2007-01-31--2007-09-04)3 member; AFET (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, needless to say, I should also like to congratulate my friend and fellow Member, Mr Lagendijk, on his report, even though we do not see eye to eye on every detail. We as a group do, of course, welcome the proposals which the negotiator, Mr Ahtisaari, presented in New York last Monday. This is also something which is clearly reflected in the report on which we will be voting tomorrow. In that respect, our group backs the report as it now stands. These proposals, as set out on this platform, also enjoy the support of the Council and the Commission. What we believe matters most of all now, though, is that the Security Council should take a decision on the status of Kosovo. This should be done without unnecessary delays, so that the uncertainty in Kosovo can be lifted before long and that both Kosovars and Serbs can focus on their future in Europe. It is not up to the European Union, however, to take a stand in this respect at the moment. In this light, it is not, as we see it, up to the EU to pre-empt the final outcome of the status in the Security Council. Kosovo’s interim status is based on a Security Council resolution, and so should its final status be. This is of the utmost importance for the international legitimacy of this decision, and it is for this reason that we have rejected Mr Posselt’s amendments. It is also essential for the internal legitimacy of the decision on the status. Indeed, the EU will not get down to the real work until after the decision in New York. To a great extent, the EU will be responsible for guiding the implementation of this status. This is something for which the Union will need to be fully prepared, but will, above all, need to avoid being piggy in the middle from the word go; this is also why my group will be voting against the amendment which qualifies the status without there having been a debate on this in New York. In this respect, we follow the line as expressed by the presidency, but also by the Commission, neither of whom mentioned qualification this afternoon."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph