Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-02-15-Speech-4-114"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-02-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070215.20.4-114"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-02-15-Speech-4-1152
lpv:speaker	lp:Jaromír Kohlíček2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-03-14)3 member; TRAN (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) (2004-09-21--2007-03-13)3 substitute; AFET (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". The readmission agreement with Russia is one of the important documents through which the Commission is attempting to regulate immigration. It actually forms part of the debate on the issues of democracy, equal rights, minority rights and the protection of cultural identity. The issue goes beyond relations with Russia and the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States. The key issue for EU Member States is mass immigration from Africa, Turkey, countries of the South Asian Association for Regional Co-operation (SAARC), Indochina, China and Latin America. The agreement with Russia should be a kind of model agreement, on the basis of which the Commission will clarify progress in the European economic area, and at the same time will gauge the extent to which it can interfere in the internal affairs of neighbouring countries. Russia is a large and powerful partner on which the EU is dependent up to a point, and because of this the agreement avoids making criticisms under the heading of ‘respect for the basic rights of the persons involved’. It is only through the issues raised in the explanatory statement from the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs that we see an attempt to use the readmission agreement to interfere in Russia’s internal affairs. This trend is so disturbing that there is no way that I can support the agreement. It runs counter to the security and humanitarian aspects of the agreement. The Committee on Foreign Affairs is mostly interested, oddly enough, in ‘the absence of a regulatory framework for implementing the agreement’. I welcome the call for the Commission to help Russian institutions implement the agreement. On the other hand, I object to the obfuscation of the concept of safe third countries."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph