Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2007-02-15-Speech-4-048"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2007-02-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Shareholders' voting rights (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20070215.5.4-048"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2007-02-15-Speech-4-0492
lpv:speaker	lp:Pervenche Berès2
lpv:spokenAs	member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 chair; ECON (2007-02-01--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AFCO (2007-01-31--2008-02-19)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; Conference of Committee Chairs (2007-02-01--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society (2006-01-19--2007-06-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Before we begin this debate, I should just like to say that I know there are no rules governing the order in which MEPs speak. That being said, I should like to draw the Chamber’s attention to a slightly odd situation whereby the rapporteur devoted all of his floor time to answer all of the speakers that had the floor, by way of a conclusion. When the issue at hand is a legislative text, those speaking on behalf of groups do so, according to our well-established practice, in an order commensurate with the political weight of their group and not at the end of the debate. It is for the Commission, which is well represented here, to respond. I am astonished by what has gone on here today. If this is a new, innovative practice, then it should be explained to us."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph