Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-13-Speech-3-478"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-12-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Development of the second-generation Schengen Information System (regulation) – Development of the second-generation Schengen Information System (decision) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061213.41.3-478"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-12-13-Speech-3-4792
lpv:speaker	lp:Barbara Kudrycka2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Platforma Obywatelska (2004-07-20--2007-11-15)3 member; LIBE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2007-11-15)3 member; Delegation for relations with Belarus (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; JURI (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 member; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-19--2007-02-14)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, I would very much like to thank Mr Coelho for such an excellent report and I would like to say that the extension of the Commission’s mandate has raised no reservations. SIS II is, and should remain, a priority. The European Parliament has done everything within its ability to ensure this is the case. We still wish to support the Commission so that SIS II can be implemented as fast as possible. The original aims of the new system were to upgrade SIS I and to expand it to incorporate the new Schengen states. The first of these aims has yet to be fulfilled. The second required a political decision and the creation of an alternative ‘ system. It is unfortunate that it had to come to that, but the European Union must keep its credibility and fulfil its political obligations towards the new Member States. However, I am hoping for a clear definition of how, in terms of organisation, time and funding are concerned, the project will influence the implementation of the second generation SIS system. We still need close cooperation and Parliament needs to be kept up to date regarding both projects. We also expect the Commission to adopt a more assertive and demanding attitude towards the Member States, to avoid recriminations later on. SIS II is a Community project funded from the European Union’s budget. This means that the Commission and the Member States bear the responsibility to a greater extent than was previously the case with the international SIS 1+ system. The Commission can count on the European Parliament’s political support. However, lessons need to be learned from the mistakes and failures that have occurred so far. I also hope that, in the end, the work of the Commission will result in all Member States feeling that they all own the SIS II project together, with no divisions between the new and old Schengen Member States."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"SIS I for all’"1 "‘SIS I for all’"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph