Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-12-Speech-2-351"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20061212.45.2-351"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, we on the Committee on Budgets are particularly interested in how money that has been saved in other areas of expenditure is to be transferred to this fund. If the budget is drafted for year N, the Council wanted to use the money according to the following procedure: first the unused margins for year N minus 1 preceding the budget under debate would be transferred to the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and only then would the unused commitment appropriations for year N minus 2 preceding it be transferred to the fund. Parliament, however, could not accept the logic of this order of events. We wanted first to use the known commitment appropriations for the year N minus 2 preceding the drafting of the budget and only then the margins for the year N minus 1.
The Commission supported Parliament’s position, a strong indication of which is the letter on fund transfers sent to Parliament by Commissioner Dalia Grybauskaitė. The Council accepted this arrangement at the trilogue meeting. I want to thank Roselyne Bachelot-Narquin for her excellent levels of cooperation. The Committee on Budgets can thus adopt the outcome of the trilogue discussions."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples