Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-12-Speech-2-035"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-12-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Financing instrument for development cooperation – A financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high-income countries and territories (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061212.8.2-035"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-12-12-Speech-2-0362
lpv:speaker	lp:Georgios Papastamkos2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; INTA (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2004-09-22--2007-01-17)3 substitute; AFCO (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-21--2007-01-17)3 unknown; Nea Dimokratia (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"( Mr President, my intervention refers to Mr Martin’s report, whom I must congratulate on his creative contribution. His report refers to the financial instrument for developing cooperation with industrialised countries and territories. The discussion regarding the institution of the said financial instrument is part of a wider problem that concerns primarily the harmonisation of the European Union's actions in foro interno, in foro externo and secondarily the cohesion of the European Union’s entire foreign activity, whether political, financial or commercial. In particular, the proposed regulation unites a heterogeneous group of countries as well as a wide range of activities in fields such as economy, commerce, research and scientific cooperation. Distributing resources per field of activity on the one hand, and per country or group of countries on the other, should reflect the European Union’s strategic, political, financial and commercial objectives. Ladies and gentlemen, with respect to the cohesion of European Union’s foreign activity I would like to refer to the new trade strategy that the Commissioner on International Trade, announced. Given that this strategy concerns our next steps with important European Union trade partners, is a compatibility issue regarding the European Union’s political priorities being raised? Does it connect the range of subject matters covered by the proposed financial instrument with European Union’s internal political choices? Moreover, should not it promote even more the European Parliament’s active role in the determination of priorities as well as the evaluation of programme effectiveness?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"EL)"1 "Georgios Papastamkos (PPE-DE ). –"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph