Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-12-12-Speech-2-034"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-12-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Financing instrument for development cooperation – A financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high-income countries and territories (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"et"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061212.8.2-034"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-12-12-Speech-2-0352
lpv:speaker	lp:Toomas Savi2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; ALDE (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; DEVE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with Canada (2004-09-21--2007-03-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; REGI (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Eesti Reformierakond (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"The financial instrument for development cooperation involves a very fragile compromise between the commission, the Council and Parliament. We must also recognise that Parliament’s views have largely been taken into consideration during the codecision procedure. Any proposal to add a new instrument would mean that the instrument would not be implemented from the beginning of the following year, and the aid might not even reach those who need it. The instrument will cover a broad range of developing countries, from the very least developed countries to high-income countries. The instrument will also cover a wide range of topics and include activities that were previously financed from the environment budget. I am satisfied with the course of the proceedings, during which the European People’s Party has removed those motions to amend that contained mention of political institutions, and thus I will offer a brief conclusion. I would like to emphasise once again that the financial instrument for development cooperation is a compromise between institutions, and the slowing of its processing would mean the delaying and interruption of aid, which certainly does not serve the instrument’s purpose of promoting democracy and human rights. I therefore support the passing of the report without any amendments."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph