Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-11-15-Speech-3-135"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20061115.11.3-135"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Despite the significant progress made in relation to the European Commission’s initial text, the text on services in the Union that has been proposed today at second reading does not offer guarantees that are sufficient to prevent any risk of the European social model falling apart.
Certain sensitive social services, such as social housing, family support services and public health services, which were initially excluded from the scope of the future directive at first reading, have thus been reintegrated by the Member States.
The legal vacuum accompanying, in particular, the abolition of the PPO has not been removed, leaving it to the arbitration of the Court of Justice judges – and not to the legislator – to define the future characteristics of European policy via the case-laws that this situation will most certainly generate.
It is clear, in this context, that the Commission’s written statement, which is aimed at clarifying some of the gaps in the text, such as the exclusion of labour law, does not present any real legal value, and that makes its influence and usefulness particularly uncertain.
For all these reasons, I voted to reject the proposal for a directive on services."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples