Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-11-14-Speech-2-170"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20061114.33.2-170"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"We are voting against this report, but we are abstaining from voting on the Commission’s proposal in this area.
The explanatory statement in this report contains a number of views such as criticism of the common agricultural policy being abandoned or renationalised – something which the June List would find desirable – and of it contravening the European Parliament’s right of participation, a view that the June List does not share.
In addition, the explanatory statement maintains that the ‘health check’, or the ‘mid-term review’ as we prefer to call it, of the long-term budget planned for 2008/2009 should only form the basis of proposals for the financing period
2013. The June List absolutely does not share this view. We believe that the mid-term review must lead to cuts in the agriculture/rural development budget as early as in the budget period currently at issue, 2007-2013."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples