Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-11-14-Speech-2-144"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-11-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061114.33.2-144"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-11-14-Speech-2-1452
lpv:speaker	lp:Emanuel Jardim Fernandes2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; REGI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Partido Socialista (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; TRAN (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". The Commission’s proposal, on which this report is based, is aimed at bringing Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 into line with the European Council Agreement of 15/16 December 2005 on the financial perspective 2007-2013, as regards the capping of allocations from the Cohesion Fund, and as regards the exemption of Portugal from the application of the cofinancing requirement for the amount of EUR 320 million. Under the terms of this agreement, the amount of EUR 320 million to be awarded to Portugal would not be ‘subject to the requirement of national cofinancing’ ‘in light of the specific difficulties of Portuguese farming’. The provision of a ‘national envelope' in the context of a global appropriation provided for by the new rural development instrument (EAFRD), and the doubling of the originally proposed amount, increased on account of the exemption in recognition of the difficulties faced by Portuguese farming, were, for Portugal, among the most positive aspects of the new political agreement that was reached under the UK Presidency as part of the lengthy and difficult negotiations on the financial framework for the next period 2007-2013. I therefore voted for the Mulder report, which advocates the adoption of the Commission proposal before us."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph