Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-11-13-Speech-1-187"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-11-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Support for rural development by the EAFRD – Voluntary modulation of direct payments under the CAP (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061113.20.1-187"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-11-13-Speech-1-1882
lpv:speaker	lp:Esther Herranz García2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; AGRI (2004-09-13--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Partido Popular (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; FEMM (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2008-04-20)3 substitute; ENVI (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the proposal that we are debating today is unacceptable. It is unacceptable because it is disintegratory, fragmentary, anti-European, selfish and highly hypocritical. From the point of view of agricultural theory, it involves cutting 20% of direct aid to farmers in order to fund rural development and thus fill in holes. These holes were created because, in the financial perspectives, 1% is not sufficient to fund the agricultural policies, and as the Member States are incapable of giving more money, they have to take it away from those who were receiving it until now. It also represents the renationalisation of the common agricultural policy: getting rid of the only truly European policy, the only policy that united European producers. And not only does it mean renationalisation, but, if we look at the proposal by the Spanish Government to the Council, it means going much further: not only renationalising, but regionalising. This way everyone will be able to do what they want. I think that it is part of the disintegratory madness of the socialist Spanish President, who, Mr Parish, also has no one here to defend him, because he, along with all the presidents who signed the financial perspectives and accept this change, do not care at all about the competitiveness of the European agricultural sector and the impact that these measures may have on their economies is of little importance to them. Therefore, and in defence of European farmers and livestock breeders and of the sector, we will of course reject this proposal."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph