Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-26-Speech-4-162"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-10-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sk"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061026.22.4-162"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-10-26-Speech-4-1632
lpv:speaker	lp:Zita Pleštinská2
lpv:spokenAs	member; IMCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; TRAN (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; FEMM (2005-09-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Slovenská demokratická a kresťanská únia (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"The basic EU principles on the free movement of persons and services within the European Union forbid any discrimination on grounds of nationality against workers from other Member States in matters of employment, remuneration or any other work-related matters. What is the reality of the situation, however? Some Member States are still clinging to the transition periods that apply to the creation of labour markets. The Posted Workers Directive is closely related to the Services Directive and, despite an intense and justifiable struggle by MEPs from the new Member States, the European Parliament in the first reading omitted Articles 24 and 25 from the draft Directive on services in the internal market. We consider these articles to be crucial, as the basic ideas of the Posted Workers Directive are interpreted differently in different Member States, and workers are generally unaware of their rights as guaranteed by the Directive. Regrettably, I have to note that a Commission Guideline cannot remove obstacles to the free movement of labour and services and therefore cannot solve the problems that enterprises and workers in the Member States are experiencing as a result of the inadequate implementation of the Posted Workers Directive. I have voted against the Schroedter report because it did not include key amendments aimed at ensuring greater mobility within the EU labour market. I am concerned that the position taken by the rapporteur would place unnecessary obstacles in the way of job creation and lead to the failure of our bid to make the internal market in services fully functional."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph