Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-25-Speech-3-185"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-10-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061025.19.3-185"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-10-25-Speech-3-1862
lpv:speaker	lp:Carl Lang2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Belarus (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; PECH (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2006-12-31)3 substitute; ITRE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Front national (2004-07-20--2009-03-18)3 member; NA (2004-07-20--2007-01-14)3 member; EMPL (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". As early as at first reading, in April 2006, we came out against this report, so significant were the absurdities that it contained. This proposal at second reading is no worse. It is quite simply unacceptable. With a total budget of EUR 190 million, this programme is, indeed, a new propaganda tool in the service of the European Union. We could, without a doubt, find better uses for this sum – I am thinking, in particular, of the social sphere, agricultural aid and business creation – than to allocate it to this vague and artificial notion of European citizenship. Couched entirely in black and white terms, the document concerned is brilliant at pointing out to us what is desirable, namely to be an enthusiast of active European values; what is bad, namely to be a passive citizen; and what is worse, namely to be a Eurosceptic. Whatever happens after the inevitable approval of this report and the wasting of all that money by various associations, we shall all remain, above all, nationals of one country or another and proud to be so."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph