Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-25-Speech-3-112"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20061025.7.3-112"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Thank you very much, Mr Poettering. Thank you for coming out in defence of the honour of the President of the European Parliament.
secondly, it is very reasonable to believe that there has been some confusion and that some Members have voted the second time without being aware of precisely what was being voted on, despite the fact that I believe the Presidency had made it very clear. I believe, however, that the objections have been raised with the best of intentions and that there have certainly been errors in the interpretation of what we were voting on. Consequently, and in order to truly reflect this Parliament’s democratic will, I shall repeat the two votes.
The result of the second round is therefore the same as that of the first: the amendment has been rejected.
The result is therefore exactly the same as the previous result, but I imagine that everybody will feel reassured and that the will of the Members will have been better reflected.
I believe that what Mrs Doyle has said is totally unacceptable and that it has nothing to do with what is happening here.
We have more important things to discuss. Ladies and gentlemen, please allow me to take a few minutes to consult the members of the Bureau in relation to the three issues that have been raised during these speeches.
The Presidency will then announce its decision and I would remind you that, according to Rule 166(4) of our Rules of Procedure, the President will take the decision he considers appropriate, immediately after the points of order that have been raised with regard to what is being discussed, and that the President’s decision will not be subject to any vote. In other words, whatever the President decides will be applied.
Please allow me now to consult the members of the Bureau on the technical issues relating to the three problems raised.
Ladies and gentlemen, having consulted Parliament's services and having studied the aspects of our Rules of Procedure that relate to the issues that we have debated, I believe that we should proceed as follows:
with regard to the Resolution presented by a series of political groups, the PSE, ALDE, GUE/NGL and Verts/ALE Groups, I am told – and I have no reason to doubt it - that the text is available in all languages. I am also told that there were last-minute amendments to the text, yesterday, that the Bureau accepted them without subjecting them to any formal amendment procedure because it did not believe that to be necessary. The Resolution presented by the PSE, ALDE, GUE/NGL and Verts/ALE Groups is therefore ready to be voted on in the version subject to the latest amendment for the purposes of incorporating it into the debate. We shall vote on it;"@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"(Parliament approved the motion for a resolution by the PSE, ALDE, GUE/NGL and Verts/ALE Groups by roll-call vote)"1
"(Parliament rejected the amendment by show of hand, verified electronically)"1
"(Parliament rejected the motion for a resolution by the PPE-DE and UEN Groups by roll-call vote)"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples