Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-10-12-Speech-4-093"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-10-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Future action in the field of patents (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20061012.31.4-093"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-10-12-Speech-4-0942
lpv:speaker	lp:Eva Lichtenberger2
lpv:spokenAs	member; TRAN (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; JURI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Die Grünen - Die Grüne Alternative (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; G/EFA (2004-07-20--2007-02-26)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, there are differences between the French and English translations of the original document of which we must take note. Whereas the English text makes explicit reference to accession to the Munich Convention, the French version talks in terms of discussion about accession to it, and there is a considerable difference between the two. We now, therefore, do not know how the text is to be interpreted. If the English version is normative, then the French MEPs need to be aware that they are agreeing to accession to the Munich Convention, even though the formulation in the French version is rather softer. The differences are in the detail."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph