Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-09-26-Speech-2-358"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-09-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Taking into account previous convictions in another Member State (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060926.28.2-358"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-09-26-Speech-2-3592
lpv:speaker	lp:Marek Aleksander Czarnecki2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; LIBE (2004-07-21--2006-11-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Israel (2004-10-13--2007-03-13)3 unknown; Samoobrona RP (2004-07-20--2008-05-04)3 member; NA (2004-07-20--2006-11-14)3 member; JURI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"(PL) Mr President, the framework decision that we are debating is particularly important as regards the assimilation and harmonisation of legislation. I agree with the rapporteur that national law should be the only criterion determining whether, and to what extent, legal effects should be attached to previous convictions handed down abroad. However, we should not forget basic principles such as the statute of limitations, amnesty or removal of entries from the national criminal register. I therefore think that we should retain Article 4. We should also emphasise that, during the course of criminal proceedings in a Member State, we cannot allow convictions handed down abroad to be taken into account if they relate to acts that are not punishable in the Member State in question. I agree with the rapporteur that the best place for the provisions contained in Article 6 is in the proposal concerning the Council framework decision on the exchange between the Member States of information pertaining to the criminal register and its contents."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Marek Aleksander Czarnecki (NI )."1 "ne bis in idem"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph