Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-09-26-Speech-2-170"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060926.20.2-170"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Given the importance to people seeking to move to other countries of mutual recognition of qualifications between the different EU Member States, a European Qualifications Framework could prove beneficial.
I share the report’s view that the setting of prescriptive criteria for learning pathways or for the duration and location of education and training courses must be rejected. We also welcome the idea that the organisation and validation of lifelong learning are a matter for the Member States and cannot easily be brought within the purview of the EQF.
Yet we must focus on the form in which the EQF is developed, the foundations on which it is based and the objectives that we are seeking to attain.
In this regard, the report contains some contradictions, for example, the attempts to bring the EQF into line with the so-called Bologna process and the so-called Lisbon Strategy, which as we know, is aimed primarily at pandering to the interests of the economic and financial groups. Hence our abstention."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples