Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-09-25-Speech-1-041"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060925.12.1-041"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spoken text |
"Mr President, in its Europe 2006 report the Federal Government of Switzerland published a cost-benefit analysis of possible membership of the European Union. It examined three alternatives: to continue the current set of bilateral sector-specific arrangements, to join the European Economic Area, or to become a full member of the EU.
The Swiss calculated that full EU membership would cost between six and nine times as much as the current system of bilateral trading arrangements. They decided that the resulting loss of sovereignty and freedom of action and the negative economic effects would far outweigh any supposed benefits.
The report concludes that Switzerland’s interests are best served by staying out of the EU and continuing with its existing sector-specific trading arrangements. It is good to know that there is still at least one European government that understands the meaning of the words ‘in the national interest’, even if it is not the British Government."@en1
|
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples