Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-07-04-Speech-2-308"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060704.31.2-308"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
".
Yes, of course we are thinking about this communication strategy. In my own view, the best way to show the public how important it is to abolish powers of veto is to give them concrete examples. One such example is an initiative concerning a minimum standard with regard to procedural rights, where we are still in a stalemate after two years of discussion precisely because of the unanimity system. Again, for example, when we talk about cross-border police cooperation, we are still blocked after 18 months of very difficult discussions because of unanimity. These are concrete examples for the public. Does the public think it is useful to have procedural rights or police cooperation at European level? Then please help us."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples