Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-06-15-Speech-4-089"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-06-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060615.24.4-089"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-06-15-Speech-4-0902
lpv:speaker	lp:Lapo Pistelli2
lpv:spokenAs	member; LIBE (2005-02-21--2007-01-14)3 chair; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2006-05-17--2007-03-13)3 substitute; AFET (2004-07-30--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Gulf States, including Yemen (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 unknown; La Margherita (2004-07-21--2008-02-06)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2006-05-17--2008-04-28)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 vice-chair; ALDE (2004-12-06--2007-02-26)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, a broad – practically unanimous – consensus was reached by this House this morning on the Seventh Framework Programme. As we know, Europe is making a significant economic effort in line with the Lisbon Strategy. My fellow Members will have noted the breadth of the debate stirred up by Article 6 on bioethics, in relation to which the compromise amendment tabled by the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy was accepted by a margin of little more than 40 votes, which is certainly a substantial, but not a majority, margin. At the same time, more stringent amendments on this subject, such as, for example, the amendment tabled by Mrs Niebler on stem cells, which seemed more reasonable to some of us, were rejected by less than 20 votes. The Italian delegation from the Margherita party supported these amendments. With this explanation of vote, I intend to highlight the fact that the intense debate stirred up by an issue that, in reality, involves less than 1% of our resources should prompt Parliament and the Commission to adopt the precautionary principle, so as not to underestimate the impact of this matter on public opinion, to which we refer when we seek consensus for Europe."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph