Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-06-01-Speech-4-165"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-06-01"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060601.27.4-165"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-06-01-Speech-4-1662
lpv:speaker	lp:Marine Le Pen2
lpv:spokenAs	member; CULT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Front national (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Israel (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; NA (2004-07-20--2007-01-14)3 substitute; IMCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". How can one have a cultural exchange with another if one does not know who one is? You recognise that ‘religious identity is an essential part of the identity for all of us, even those who are not religious’, but you refused to recognise our Christian roots in your Constitution which is, happily for us, dead and buried. What are we talking about then? Amendment 9 speaks of ‘intercultural civility’, but that is a contradiction in terms, otherwise civility no longer means anything! The addition of fine, high-flown words often just ends up meaning nothing. The result of your approach is relativism and betrayal: you want to promote the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue at the Olympic Games in Beijing and thus serve as a spare wheel for a Communist dictatorship (Amendment 38)! What a disgrace! You are going to talk about intercultural dialogue with Tibet, no doubt? This initiative on its own disqualifies your proposal."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph