Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-06-01-Speech-4-105"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-06-01"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU-US economic relations (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060601.19.4-105"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-06-01-Speech-4-1062
lpv:speaker	lp:Erika Mann2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; ITRE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2004-09-22--2009-07-13)3 member; INTA (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-22--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CONT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, at this point, the voting order suggests that we should vote on Amendment 18 first and then on paragraph 7, and do it in four parts. What we need to do here is, first to vote on Amendment 18, which is compatible with the proposal for split votes, while keeping things in the right order. I would, however, propose that we ignore the vote on Part 1, which is identical with 2, 3 and 4, apart from the difference that split votes have been proposed for 2, 3 and 4 and that Part 1 proposes that 2, 3 and 4 be voted on together. I would also make so bold as to add something. The proposal for a split vote on Parts 2, 3 and 4 refers only to the amendments to the English version and not to the versions in other languages. I hope that makes sense."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(General laughter)"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph