Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-05-31-Speech-3-254"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-05-31"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Prohibitions on certain sex offenders (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060531.22.3-254"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-05-31-Speech-3-2552
lpv:speaker	lp:Johannes Blokland2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; TRAN (2004-09-15--2007-01-14)3 member; LIBE (2004-09-14--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-11-18--2006-12-12)3 vice-chair; ENVI (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 treasurer; IND/DEM (2004-07-26--2007-02-12)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; ChristenUnie - Staatkundig Gereformeerde Parti (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, I would like to say ‘good morning’ to all those who have stayed here for so long. It goes without saying that I am in full agreement with all previous speakers as regards the regrettably dire necessity of excluding from certain professions those convicted of crimes of indecency. That being so, whilst the circumstances that triggered this motion are sad, Belgium deserves credit for having tabled it for a framework decision. As the convict in question was able to return to paid employment in Belgium and took advantage of the situation, we must do everything we can to avoid this sort of thing happening again. There are, however, major differences between national laws in the area of removal from employment, which can be accomplished by means of criminal law, civil law or administrative arrangements. The motion does not provide fresh funds for exchanging information. Are the existing funds to exchange data from the criminal records sufficient to allow bans from employment that are brought about via a different legal form to be notified? Mutual notification of disbarments from employment also means that the Member States will enforce a ban when that has been issued in a different Member State. Is this a first step towards obtaining mutual recognition in the area of professional bans? What I should like to be told is whether this motion can be implemented without the need for additional funds."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph