Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-05-17-Speech-3-304"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-05-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Council Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060517.21.3-304"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-05-17-Speech-3-3052
lpv:speaker	lp:Othmar Karas2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society (2006-01-19--2007-06-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-16--2007-03-13)3 substitute; JURI (2005-04-25--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Österreichische Volkspartei - Liste Ursula Stenzel (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; IMCO (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; EPP-ED (2004-11-14--2007-02-14)3 member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"This issue of course demonstrates that unanimity is a stumbling block not only on taxation in general, but also within taxation issues. After all, as the President-in-Office has said, there is majority support for this uniform assessment basis, but an open door to agreement is not yet in sight. My question to the President-in-Office is: to his knowledge of the counter-arguments, how many countries firmly oppose this, and does he envisage any possibility of overcoming the barrier of unanimity? In addition, should we not abolish unanimity altogether in the case of taxation relevant to the internal market?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph