Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-05-17-Speech-3-128"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-05-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060517.16.3-128"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-05-17-Speech-3-1292
lpv:speaker	lp:Jamila Madeira2
lpv:spokenAs	member; REGI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; EMPL (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Partido Socialista (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". I voted in favour of the Böge report on the interinstitutional agreement because I feel that it represents the highest common denominator, following lengthy negotiations in trialogue. I must register my deep concern, however, about the apparent discrepancy between what is stipulated in the agreement reached in December and its practical application. It would appear that a discrepancy has now emerged in the funds earmarked for the Algarve region in the context of exceptional measures adopted for statistical effect regions. If the information is to be believed, the Algarve region will be seriously harmed by the Commission’s interpretation of the December Agreement, which could lead to the Algarve receiving far worse treatment than any other Objective 2 region, as it will no longer be eligible for phasing out. In the name of transparency and good interinstitutional cooperation, I feel that it is extremely important that the bases of the interpretation of the content of the 2007-2013 financial package be clarified."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph