Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-05-16-Speech-2-169"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060516.32.2-169"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Of all the issues raised in this report, the one that deserves the greatest attention is the impact assessment of Community law.
As I have previously stated, in spite of constant and perhaps excessive amounts of legislative output, it is possible to monitor closely the Community institutions’ legislative output and more importantly the impact thereof. This is an area that should always be high on the agenda.
In this regard, subsidiarity is very much a relevant factor, which, in its broadest form, should be one of the cornerstones of lawmaking in the EU. This is perfect for subsidiarity, whereby the needs of each country are catered for, and close links between the authorities and the citizens are maintained.
That being said, this principle is obviously inappropriate for a great many situations that should be approached at Community level. Yet this is also a key feature of this principle. I should lastly like to mention the importance of recognising the role of the national parliaments, which is vital to a good legal outcome. Without prejudice to the other elements, these are the key elements for better lawmaking."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples