Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-05-15-Speech-1-144"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-05-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Recovery of the stock of European eel (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060515.17.1-144"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-05-15-Speech-1-1452
lpv:speaker	lp:Rosa Miguélez Ramos2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Partido Socialista Obrero Español (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3 member; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; TRAN (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 vice-chair; PECH (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, this proposal is the result of the Commission’s Communication on the development of a Community action plan for the management of European eels. This Communication proposed actions such as the prohibition of fishing gear intended for the capture of silver eels in certain areas, measures to facilitate their emigration downstream and also, finally, additional proposals intended to improve the survival rate during other phases of their life cycle. The Commission justified this sequence with the premise that the advantages resulting from a reduction in the fishing of young eel are still uncertain and it stressed its belief that the evolution of the population depended on factors other than fishing, the pollution of riverbeds, the disappearance of habitats, the non-maintenance of ecological values and obstacles to upstream and downstream migrations. Starting with this approach – with which I agree – we ended up with a proposed Regulation which points to fishing as solely responsible for the European eel population falling outside of the biological safety limits. The proposal also includes an arbitrary fifteen-day ban that lacks any biological justification. a ban on fishing, landing or conserving eels from the first to the fifteenth day of each month. These are drastic, erroneous and supplemented measures with an objective that is very difficult to define or monitor – the escape to the sea of 40% of the biomass of adult eel. In this regard, the report by the Committee on Fisheries and the work by the rapporteur, Mr Maat, corrects these two serious problems and they will naturally have our support. I would also like to address the People’s Party and our rapporteur, Mr Maat, to ask them not to start fires and then end up having to put them out, and I am talking specifically about the proposal for a ban on elvers, which would have extremely serious consequences for certain regions in my country."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph