Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-26-Speech-3-213"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20060426.16.3-213"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". I would like to thank the rapporteur for his splendid report and am pleased that we are joined today by a member of the Competition Commission. As a representative of the Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe, I believe competition policy is very important and would like to discuss matters which are extremely important from a competition point of view – financial asset management. First of all, I would like to say that financial asset companies are broadening their activities in the new countries and we are getting to the stage where the products being sold are very similar. It is unclear why one product or another is being sold. One can only assume that there are certain agreements between the financial asset managers and the distributors of those assets. However, it would be better if this was expressed in a clear manner and the relationships were revealed to see if these services are being paid for, so that the consumer would at least know that he/she is being offered certain products because a commission is being paid for them. The second problem is related to the evaluation of market analysis expenses. At the moment, financial asset managers are selling their services together with financial analysis and it is unclear to the consumer whether that analysis really was undertaken, what it includes and what its true price is. Pension funds or an ordinary retail customer can evaluate the expenses and choose a better asset manager when these expenses are fully revealed. I would also like to draw attention to the fact that financial asset companies should not be burdened with unnecessary restrictions. It is often difficult for financial intermediaries working in small countries to avoid conflicts of interest. And the requirement to simply reveal that conflict of interest helps neither the consumer, nor the financial company, as the consumer does not understand what is being revealed and the company has to fill in additional documentation in order to explain. In truth it would be better if a conflict of interest was appropriately managed and it is important to guarantee this legally. Another problem being encountered, as the Commission Member mentioned, is that various companies are selling various retail savings products. Let us say, insurance companies and financial asset management companies are now selling very similar products. However, financial asset management companies have to reveal a lot of information, whereas insurance companies reveal far less. At times, the consumer is given the incorrect impression that insurance company products are cheaper or better. I believe that this area also needs our attention."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph