Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-26-Speech-3-025"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-04-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Agenda2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060426.8.3-025"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-04-26-Speech-3-0262
lpv:speaker	lp:Daniel Cohn-bendit2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (Germany) (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-03-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 co-chair; G/EFA (2005-05-24--2007-07-19)3 member; Conference of Presidents (2004-07-20--2006-12-12)3
lpv:translated text	"Clearly, Mr President, I do not understand a thing. Mr Wurtz stated that the proposal had been made well after the Conference of Presidents. If Mr Wurtz is right, then the Conference of Presidents, which took place beforehand, was unable to examine the proposal, and that seems logical to me. The person who made the proposal is the chairman of the Confederal Group of the European United Left/Nordic Green Left. He just told us and you and I both heard him that he made the proposal after the Conference of Presidents. Given that the proposal was made after the Conference of Presidents, that Conference, which took place beforehand, was unable to debate it. That argument seems unanswerable to me. Secondly, I will be very clear: if the two main groups are against a resolution being submitted, then there will be no resolution. I would, however, like a vote to be held in this Chamber in order to decide whether or not there will be a resolution. You have your arguments, and they are genuine; I, for my part, have other arguments that are just as genuine. The majority will decide. That is democracy, thank you."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph