Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-26-Speech-3-023"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-04-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Agenda2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060426.8.3-023"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-04-26-Speech-3-0242
lpv:speaker	lp:Martin Schulz2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Conference of Presidents (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; LIBE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; DROI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 chair; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the decision under discussion – about which Mr Wurtz has said everything that needed to be said – was taken because we wanted a debate, but we also, considering among other things Mr Abbas’ forthcoming visit here in Brussels or in Strasbourg, said that it is not proper for us, here today and considering a subject like this, which can potentially have such a great political impact, to come to decisions and put them in the form of a resolution, and that is why we will not be supporting this motion, perfectly plain though it is that the motion is a legitimate one to put to this plenary, which is the highest authority in this House. On this point I wholeheartedly endorse the line taken by Mr Cohn-Bendit. I would, though, like to impart to the House something that Mr Cohn-Bendit did not say. The Conference of Presidents is composed of ordinary Members – that is true, and Mr Cohn-Bendit is one of them – and the same Mr Cohn-Bendit, in the Conference of Presidents, welcomes the support of other group chairmen whenever they endorse his schemes – even when they are things that would not be likely to get a majority if voted on in this plenary."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph