Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-05-Speech-3-128"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-04-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060405.14.3-128"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-04-05-Speech-3-1292
lpv:speaker	lp:Hubert Pirker2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (2006-02-01--2009-07-13)3 member; AFET (2006-02-02--2007-01-14)3 substitute; LIBE (2006-02-02--2007-01-14)3 chair; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2006-03-21--2007-03-13)3 member; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-02-02--2007-02-14)3 member; SEDE (2006-02-02--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Österreichische Volkspartei - Liste Ursula Stenzel (2006-02-01--2009-07-13)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2006-03-21--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I am giving this explanation of vote on behalf of the delegation from the Austrian People's Party. We voted against the report because it calls for the currently applicable transitional periods for the free movement of workers to be abolished. We voted against this because we expect the accession treaty, which all countries – including the new Member States – signed, to be retained, including its transitional provisions to protect the Austrian labour market. This is quite justified, because statistics show that the number of workers from the new Member States has already doubled in the last two years. The delegation from the Austrian People's Party opposes the report because, both now and in the future, only Austria can and will decide how long the entry restrictions guaranteed under the accession treaty will be retained in the interests of the Austrian workforce – it could be for up to seven years."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph