Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-05-Speech-3-068"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-04-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Calendar of part-sessions for 2007 (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060405.6.3-068"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-04-05-Speech-3-0722
lpv:speaker	lp:Daniel Cohn-bendit2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (Germany) (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-03-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 co-chair; G/EFA (2005-05-24--2007-07-19)3 member; Conference of Presidents (2004-07-20--2006-12-12)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, if there is an alternative to Strasbourg, I am all in favour of discussing it; that is what I have always said, but using this as a way of doing so is absurd and unfair. It must surely be plain to see that for as long as the Council, unanimously, insists on Strasbourg, we shall have twelve part-sessions in this place, and whether Mr Titley understands English or German or French, he should simply take a look at the treaties, something that might also sometimes be a salutary exercise for Mr Blair’s Government. I therefore think that we should have another debate on Strasbourg, but not in this fashion. What we should do this week is vote on our calendar. By what, Mr Titley, do you justify your assertion that our orders of business here in Strasbourg are not full? You should just try standing in for Mr Schulz in the Conference of Presidents and then you would know that what you claim is a bare-faced lie and bears no relation to the facts."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Applause)"1 "(Applause, uproar)"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph