Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-04-Speech-2-135"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-04-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060404.18.2-135"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-04-04-Speech-2-1362
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexander Stubb2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2008-04-03)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; AFET (2005-01-13--2007-01-14)3 member; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Kansallinen Kokoomus (2004-07-20--2008-04-03)3 substitute; IMCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; CONT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2006-12-31)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I would like to say a few words about Hammerstein Mintz’s report and voting behaviour. I do support openness, but I am also in favour of a certain degree of realism. It is perfectly obvious that the Council meetings should be open, but in points 14 and 15 this Parliament voted in favour of the meetings of COREPER, the Permanent Representatives – that is to say the ambassadors of the EU – being open, and those of the Conciliation Committee too. We can certainly insist on this, but one would assume that the Council also has the right to insist that all our group meetings, preparatory meetings and all meetings of the Conference of Presidents should be open. I therefore support openness, but I do not think that it is realistic to insist on openness on the part of COREPER."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Alexander Stubb (PPE-DE ). –"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph