Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-03-14-Speech-2-174"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-03-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:State of the European footwear sector one year after liberalisation (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060314.24.2-174"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-03-14-Speech-2-1752
lpv:speaker	lp:Erika Mann2
lpv:spoken text	". Mr President, I have a few questions and I will not be able to speak on behalf of my group in this case because, as with the anti-dumping cases, I think we are pretty much divided and have our own views on this issue. Nevertheless, I want to thank the Commissioner for presenting his point of view and for intervening. My starting point is that the anti-dumping measures and instruments need to be taken quite seriously. On that point, I support my colleague Mr Sturdy, who is right. If we do not use the instrument in a transparent and fair way it could become quite complicated for us. My first question to the Commissioner is: will the EU produce an overall assessment of the conditions of competition and state intervention in the People’s Republic of China? The European Parliament would also like to receive a report on China’s compliance with WTO rules and accession commitment five years after its accession to the WTO. Would the EC take WTO action if China and Vietnam do not stop their unfair actions within a reasonable period of time and what would these measures be? Commissioner, do you agree that the EC agreement and the results of the AD investigations are confidential and that leaks of information may lead to market distortions? Could you explain in detail the rationale behind the exclusion of children’s footwear, especially in view of the fact that in some countries children’s footwear is worn by adults? Could you explain why the publication of the results of the anti-surveillance system were so delayed? If I am not completely mistaken, it was one year. One small point: how do you see this investigation relating to another evaluation which is currently being undertaken as regards giving China market economy status?"@en1
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; ITRE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2004-09-22--2009-07-13)3 member; INTA (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-22--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CONT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Erika Mann,"1 "on behalf of the PSE Group"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph