Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-03-14-Speech-2-136"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-03-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060314.21.2-136"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-03-14-Speech-2-1372
lpv:speaker	lp:Brigitte Douay2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; REGI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 member; BUDG (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	". I voted in favour of Mr Hutchinson's report on relocation in the context of regional development having participated in the discussions in committee and having amended it. This report proposes preventing the Structural Funds from promoting measures that contribute to the relocations that have such a high social cost in our regions. It advocates establishing a European strategy to combat relocation and setting up a European Relocation Observatory to assess the real impact of European aid on relocation. This has nothing to do with returning to an administered economy, nor of damaging free and fair competition, which is the foundation of the common market. Nor is it a matter of controlling all businesses or of preventing the development of the new Member States. However, it is important to bear in mind that the Structural Funds must be tools for development and social cohesion, not weapons for a war between our regions, because, even in the richest countries in the European Union, there are still poor regions where workers watch with despair as their jobs disappear, often leaving them with no possibility of retraining."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph